Wednesday, January 26, 2011

Favorite Film Situation

Star Wars

Written and directed by George Lucas, Star Wars is considered by many to be one of the most influential films on popular culture of the modern era. The film is one of the highest grossing films of all times. Released on May 25th, 1977, the film’s sci-fi predecessor in 1976 was Logan’s Run. Comparing the technology used and cinematography techniques of the films is like comparing a prune to a plum. They’re films, that’s for certain, but Logan’s Run would appear to be a product of the Star Trek era of set and prop design, whereas Star Wars elevates set construction to a new level of art. Up until that point, hit sci-fi films made around $16 million dollars, with the most successful as 2001: A Space Odessey clocking in at $24 million dollars. Sci-fi films of the era dealt mostly with apocalyptic situations.

Star Wars was released during a time of great inflation, political scandal, rising oil prices, and a country in recovery after the Vietnam War. Films at the time were grim tales of woe and destruction, featuring anti-heroes with a bad streak. The Internet was but a glimmer, and cell phones were still years away from widespread use.

In order to develop the special effects necessary for the film, Lucas founded Industrial Light and Magic in 1975 after the special effects house at 20th Century Fox was shut down. Using a combination of blue screens, still models and moving cameras, ILM was able to create the impression of motion and excitement with the space ships. Had ILM not been founded, it would not have gathered the talent that ultimately created Pixar and the computer animation industry.

As the studio system was failing, they searched for talent direct from film school. At the time, film studios were becoming increasingly concerned with demographics, realizing that they could target young people with movies made by young people, for young people.

Lucas wanted to recreate the feeling of his original experiences watching Flash Gordon.  His interest in philosophy informed his early maverick years of film-making. Irwin Kirchner described it as “more personal”. After some failed attempts with Francis Ford Coppola, Lucas moved on to shoot American Graffiti. Disgruntled by studios tampering with his films, Lucas looked to re-invent classic Flash Gordon serials, using the works of Joseph Campbell as his basis.

In many ways, from the advent of the special effects house, to the reinvention of the space opera, to the target audience, Star Wars was the right film at the right time. Oddly enough, the film was only released to an initial 40 theatres, and had been moved to the week before Memorial Day weekend to avoid competing with other summer blockbusters. The film was released in a package with The Other Side of Midnight, another movie by 20th Century Fox, and theatres were told if they wanted Midnight, they'd have to book Star Wars as well. Though the movie was all but doomed to failure, it was able to lift everyone out of the depression of the 70's and have them look toward the future, as Walter Cronkite put it. As Bill Moyer put it "Timing is everything in art. You bring it out too early and it's Buck Rodgers, you bring it out too late, and it doesn't fit our imagination [you bring it out as the Vietnam War is ending and we don't know who we are]" The film was a story that, because it was based on the monomyth, reached across borders and ethnicities to touch the world.

Thursday, January 20, 2011

Modern Fairy Tale

"I'm going to disappoint you, you know that... right?" she apologized to the bum.
"'s what they all say."
"Why am I even listening to you?"

She knew the answer before he could answer, or maybe he never intended to answer. Whether she knew why or not was irrelevant. What she knew was that she had to find a way up to the very top of the Empire State Building.

Why not? She thought. The whole day had been abundantly strange from the moment she awoke in the morning. Strange room, strange coffee. Was it even coffee? She ruminated. Probably not. Somewhere she read that people are creatures of habit, they fall into routines and some things become so automatic we don't even think about what we're doing.

Then the World Trade Center was part of the skyline again.

Walking down the street to work, she tried to explain to people how incredible this was. What kind of government conspiracy would have kept those buildings invisible for ten years? No one had to say anything, she could tell they all thought she was completely off her rocker.

"You're not from 'round here, are you?"
"Pardon?" she was shocked back to the present by the bum.
"Ye' look lost, sweetheart. Just go gimme dat 'ting an' I'll help."
What an odd man, sitting on the side of the street. That she was talking to him caught her off guard. Maybe this was another automatic reaction? It wasn't her's though. She could never see herself speaking to a dirty hobo.

"But how can I get up there? It's high, and they've got all sorts of security!"
"S'not tha difficult, jus' look up!"

A shadow passed over the two, and she looked up to see the silhouette of a... no, it couldn't be. No one's flown one of those in years!

Wednesday, January 12, 2011

Platonic Dialogue

AIM - RaineWriet


ozzmeister00: so, my Lit and Media Studies professor
ozzmeister00: wants us to write a Socratic dialogue revolving around the topic of "media"
rainewriet: Kaaaaaay
ozzmeister00: I was going to write one that focused on how we consume comedy with all our various technological channels these days.
rainewriet: Has the potential to be funny
ozzmeister00: That's what I thought!
rainewriet: But?
ozzmeister00: well, I once heard that the worst screenplays are incredibly clear and read like novels
rainewriet: Because all the characters end up saying what they're doing.
ozzmeister00: precisely!
rainewriet: And I assume this is what happened to your dialog?
ozzmeister00: yes :(
rainewriet: Aren't you going to present these dialogs in class to your professor?
ozzmeister00: no, we're writing these as a post in our class blogs
rainewriet: Which means no one will ever perform it.
ozzmeister00: correct
ozzmeister00: everything sounded clunky. because I knew no one would be performing, I had the characters saying what they were doing
ozzmeister00: instead of


"Wow, that sounds like a hilarious YouTube video," Ozzy said, pulling out his iPhone to search for the video


I had to write:


OZZY: Wow, that sounds like a hilarious YouTube video! Let me pull out my iPhone and look for it.


rainewriet: Awkward.
ozzmeister00: indubitably!
ozzmeister00: my biggest frustration is the dissonance between the media's intention, and its usage herein
rainewriet: can you talk to your professor to see if you could switch the assignment to something in prose?
ozzmeister00: nah, I think I've got something that'll sort this mess out. 
ozzmeister00: I just know I can't do the comedy one. How can I write a dialogue about comedy and not have it be even remotely entertaining?
ozzmeister00: pity, I had such a great opening line.
rainewriet: Pity.
rainewriet: Well, I'm off.
ozzmeister00: cheers!
rainewriet: G'night.
rainewriet signed off

Tuesday, January 11, 2011

My Situation as a Reader

I'm a 21 year old male, majoring in Game Art and Design at the Ringling College of Art and Design.

What this means for my situation as a reader is that I have very little time in which to read, be it books, newspapers, magazines, etc. In order to streamline reading into my daily life, I minimize what I read to information relevant to my career which can be found on the Internet. This generally means the information I receive is condensed to the bare necessities, and this suits me just fine. I have a set list of websites I check on a bi-daily basis from which to derive my information, and will occasionally venture out from that set if I hear about something particularly interesting.

Most of my reading takes place in front of a backlit LCD screen. Looking toward the future, I'm considering investing in some form of tablet computer so I can read in a fashion similar to the Nook or Kindle, and do so more readily than a stationary computer.

I grew up reading codecs, usually science fiction or fantasy novels, which set me on the path that lead me to where I am. I bring a scientific and analytical mind to what I read.

Monday, January 10, 2011

Phaedrus Topics

Initially, the two men discuss "love", based on a speech written by Lysias. This then evolves into a discussion of the art of rhetoric, moving in and out of focus on the initial topic of love.

However, because I fear that "Love" and "Public Speaking" may not be sufficient, a more detailed list follows, categorized by the major topics under which they fall:

1) Love
-The nature of love, as one cannot advise upon a thing, without knowing that thing.
-Lovers vs. Non-lovers, and the merits and detriments of both. I prefer to think of these two archetypes as "Thinkers" and "Feelers" to avoid immediate negative connotations, and because the "Love" of which Socrates and Phaedrus speak is not the same as our modern sense of the word.
-Rational vs. Irrational desire. Socrates defines love as irrational desire.
-Wolves love lambs as lovers love their loves.
-Whatever we say to speak against the lover, can be spoken in favor of the non-lover
-Love can be mean, or as Jay Guiles put it "Love Stinks"
-They discuss the four kinds of madness, and that love is noble madness.

2) Rhetoric
-A speech may be more well-received if the speaker is passionate about the topic
-A man's opinions are the result of the aggregate opinion of all that he has learned. He uses the ideas of those who have come before him to synthesize new opinions.
-A speaker may repeat himself many times and many ways as a way of showing off his intellect, or to disquiet any possible contention.
-Passion about a subject can fuel a speaker's words
-By challenging someone to make a better speech than a bad one, we ourselves will make bad speech
-We cater our rhetoric to the intended audience
-Laws are a manner in which the politicians praise themselves and their intellect
-There's no disgrace in writing, only in writing badly.
-The rules of writing and speech
--Is the speaker required to know what he's talking about?
---His ignorance can turn good into evil
-Rhetoric is not the sole domain of the politician, it is present in everyday life
-Those who wish to deceive must know the truth, so that he knows what truth looks like and can thus create the illusion of truth
-A speaker needs to acknowledge the things upon which everyone is agreed, so that he may specifically address that which is disagreed. In knowing that, he is more likely to be successful in addressing the things upon which we disagree
-Discourse should have structure, follow a logical order from beginning to end
-The separation of the specific, and the general
-After defining the thing about which you will be speaking, speaking to that subject, you must summarize your arguments at the end for your audience
-The power of the art of rhetoric
-You must analyze as you go, otherwise you've no idea what effect you have
-Propriety and improprieties of writing
-The written word cannot adapt itself to each viewer, and is laid bare the same for all to see
-Know your audience
-Anyone who bases their work upon truth can be called "philosopher"


-We have no visible image of wisdom on earth, we only see beauty.
-Our experiences are never as powerful as when we experienced them. We can renew the power of those experiences by experiencing something more powerful